Sloth And Dignity. I WORKED REAL HARD ON THIS LAYOUT... TURN YOUR GRAPHICS ON PLEASE. Thank you. -Mike
Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · User Info · https://www.mikeycosm.org  
Single Entry View: <<Previous Entry Next Entry>> Back To All Entries>>>

10/4/13 @ 09:40 pm   
Zog IV
 
had a professor who I never forgot. We learn, for instance, that the gravitational attraction between two objects is the product of the masses divided by the square of the distance between them... F=(M*m)/r^2, in the parlance (There's more to it actually, but that's the basics.) This is just a fact to be memorized, a basic truth in physics. Now he gave open-book tests, take-homes, etc... he was very generous, as long as you could get correct answers onto the page, he was good with it. But that's because while you learned that F=(M*m)/r^2, on the test you were more likely to see a question like this:

"Space around planet Zog IV has been flattened into a 2-dimensional continuum by a collision with a space-bourne dinosaur. What is the formula for gravitational attraction in this now 2-dimensional space?" And suddenly, if you didn't understand *why* F=(M*m)/r^2 in 3-dimensional space, how that equation was derived, and be able to apply that understanding to a situation where a fundamental underlying physical constant was different, you weren't going to get the point. Just memorizing the facts you were taught wasn't good enough to get an A in that class.

But not being the kind of crazy super-genius who can immediately reckon new physical equations in his head to account for interstellar sauropods wouldn't kill your grade, either. As I recall, although he was famous for these sorts of very tough questions, he didn't grade *that* tough. I still managed to pass that class OK. And although I didn't get the question right on that test — I didn't even know how to begin to figure it out — he inspired me to be curious about it. And 25 years after finally finding out, I still remember that the force of gravitational attraction in 2-D space, something there's really no reason to ever know, is (M*m)/r, and with minimal brushing up I could probably still tell you exactly why that is, which is probably the entire point.

I appreciated his teaching style.
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture Icon]
From:mike20
Date:November 3rd, 2013 12:53 am (UTC)
(Entry permanent URL)
Decline to mention biographical details on the blog any more frequently than necessary, but it's mentioned here: http://mike20.livejournal.com/#12823
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
Site Meter